Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Citroën ë-C3 charges faster with a peak of 100 kW DC, while the Dacia Spring is more efficient at 152 Wh/km. The Citroën ë-C3 offers more WLTP rated range at 326 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Citroën ë-C3 | Dacia Spring |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~44 kWh | ~25 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~326 km | ~230 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~172 Wh/km | ~152 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 100 kW | up to 34 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~26 min | ~38 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 7.4 kW | up to 6.6 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Citroën ë-C3 has a peak DC charging speed of 100 kW, which is roughly 194% faster than the Dacia Spring at 34 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Citroën ë-C3 finishes in about 26 minutes, which is 12 minutes quicker than the Dacia Spring at 38 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Citroën ë-C3 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 326 km, which is roughly 96 km more than the Dacia Spring at approximately 230 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Dacia Spring consumes 152 Wh/km, compared to 172 Wh/km for the Citroën ë-C3. That means the Dacia Spring uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Citroën ë-C3 has approximately 44 kWh of useable battery , while the Dacia Spring has approximately 25 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Citroën ë-C3 wins on both peak power (up to 100 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 26 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Citroën ë-C3 supports up to 7.4 kW, compared to 6.6 kW for the Dacia Spring. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Dacia Spring is the more efficient choice at 152 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Citroën ë-C3 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 326 km, which is roughly 96 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.