Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Citroën ë-C3 vs Hyundai INSTER

Updated March 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Hyundai INSTER charges faster with a peak of 120 kW DC, while the Hyundai INSTER is more efficient at 153 Wh/km. The Hyundai INSTER offers more WLTP rated range at 370 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Citroën ë-C3 Hyundai INSTER
Battery (approx.) ~44 kWh ~46 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~326 km ~370 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~172 Wh/km ~153 Wh/km
Max DC charging up to 100 kW up to 120 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~26 min ~25 min
Max AC charging up to 7.4 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Hyundai INSTER has a peak DC charging speed of 120 kW, which is roughly 20% faster than the Citroën ë-C3 at 100 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Hyundai INSTER finishes in about 25 minutes, which is 1 minutes quicker than the Citroën ë-C3 at 26 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Hyundai INSTER has a WLTP rated range of approximately 370 km, which is roughly 44 km more than the Citroën ë-C3 at approximately 326 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Hyundai INSTER consumes 153 Wh/km, compared to 172 Wh/km for the Citroën ë-C3. That means the Hyundai INSTER uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Hyundai INSTER has approximately 46 kWh of useable battery , while the Citroën ë-C3 has approximately 44 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging speed is your priority, the Hyundai INSTER wins on both peak power (up to 120 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 25 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Hyundai INSTER supports up to 11 kW, compared to 7.4 kW for the Citroën ë-C3. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Hyundai INSTER is the more efficient choice at 153 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Hyundai INSTER has a WLTP rated range of approximately 370 km, which is roughly 44 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.