Ford Puma Gen-E vs Volvo EX90

Side-by-Side Specs

Charging Speed

The Volvo EX90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, which is roughly 250% higher than the Ford Puma Gen-E at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Volvo EX90 is listed at about 23 minutes, roughly matching the Ford Puma Gen-E. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.

Range and Efficiency

The Volvo EX90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 622 km, which is roughly 246 km more than the Ford Puma Gen-E at approximately 376 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Puma Gen-E consumes 159 Wh/km, compared to 213 Wh/km for the Volvo EX90. That means the Ford Puma Gen-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo EX90 has approximately 102 kWh of useable battery , while the Ford Puma Gen-E has approximately 43.6 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo EX90 has the higher published DC figure (up to 350 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 23 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Volvo EX90 supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 11 kW for the Ford Puma Gen-E. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Puma Gen-E is the more efficient choice at 159 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Volvo EX90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 622 km, which is roughly 246 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.