Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volkswagen ID.4 has a higher peak charging speed at 175 kW DC, but the Ford Puma Gen-E actually finishes the 10-80% charge faster (23 min vs 28 min) thanks to its smaller battery. The Ford Puma Gen-E is more efficient at 159 Wh/km. The Volkswagen ID.4 offers more WLTP rated range at 572 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Ford Puma Gen-E | Volkswagen ID.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~44 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~376 km | ~572 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~159 Wh/km | ~173 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 100 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~23 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volkswagen ID.4 has a peak DC charging speed of 175 kW, which is roughly 75% faster than the Ford Puma Gen-E at 100 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Ford Puma Gen-E finishes in about 23 minutes, which is 5 minutes quicker than the Volkswagen ID.4 at 28 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volkswagen ID.4 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 572 km, which is roughly 196 km more than the Ford Puma Gen-E at approximately 376 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Puma Gen-E consumes 159 Wh/km, compared to 173 Wh/km for the Volkswagen ID.4. That means the Ford Puma Gen-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volkswagen ID.4 has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the Ford Puma Gen-E has approximately 44 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
The Volkswagen ID.4 has the higher peak DC speed at up to 175 kW, but the Ford Puma Gen-E actually finishes the 10-80% charge faster at approximately 23 minutes versus approximately 28 minutes. That is because the Ford Puma Gen-E has a smaller battery to fill. On road trips, time at the plug matters more than peak power.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Puma Gen-E is the more efficient choice at 159 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volkswagen ID.4 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 572 km, which is roughly 196 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.