Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars peak at 250 kW DC charging. The Tesla Model Y is more efficient at 165 Wh/km. The Volvo EX90 offers more range at 480 km in real-world driving.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Tesla Model Y | Volvo EX90 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 75 kWh | 107 kWh |
| Real-world range | 455 km | 480 km |
| Efficiency | 165 Wh/km | 211 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | 250 kW | 250 kW |
| 10-80% charge time | 27 min | 30 min |
| Max AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| AC phase | 3-phase | 3-phase |
| Voltage architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Heat pump | Standard | Standard |
| Preconditioning | Yes | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | Yes | No |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EX90 has a peak DC charging speed of 250 kW, which is comparable to the Tesla Model Y at 250 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
Both cars use 400V architecture, so their charging curves should follow similar patterns. The difference in peak speed comes down to battery chemistry, thermal management, and the onboard charger design.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Tesla Model Y finishes in about 27 minutes, which is 3 minutes quicker than the Volvo EX90 at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX90 offers 480 km of real-world range, which is 25 km more than the Tesla Model Y at 455 km. These are real-world estimates, not WLTP numbers. Expect your actual range to vary with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Tesla Model Y consumes 165 Wh/km, compared to 211 Wh/km for the Volvo EX90. That means the Tesla Model Y uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo EX90 has a 107 kWh useable battery , while the Tesla Model Y has 75 kWh.
Cold Weather Charging
Both the Tesla Model Y and Volvo EX90 come with a heat pump as standard, which helps preserve range in cold weather by heating the cabin more efficiently.
Battery preconditioning is equally important for winter DC fast charging. When the battery is cold, charging speeds drop significantly. Both cars support preconditioning, which warms the battery before you arrive at a fast charger so you get closer to peak charging speed.
In cold conditions, expect 20-35% range loss compared to ideal weather. Cars with both a heat pump and preconditioning typically handle winter better overall.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars offer similar DC fast charging at 250 kW peak. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Tesla Model Y is the more efficient choice at 165 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo EX90 gives you 480 km of real-world range, which is 25 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
Stuck at the charger? Open the app.
Step-by-step help for real charging problems. Log the experience. Free on iOS and Android.
Free to download · Available on iOS and Android