Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Maxus MIFA 9 vs Mercedes-Benz eSprinter

Compared variants: Standard vs eSprinter 113 kWh (MY24+)

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 115 kW. The Maxus MIFA 9 is more efficient at approximately 233 Wh/km. The Mercedes-Benz eSprinter offers more WLTP rated range at 440 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Maxus MIFA 9 Mercedes-Benz eSprinter
Compared variant Standard eSprinter 113 kWh (MY24+)
Battery (approx.) ~84 kWh ~113 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~400 km ~440 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~233 Wh/km ~342 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 115 kW up to 115 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~42 min ~42 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Mercedes-Benz eSprinter has the higher published DC charging figure at 115 kW, which is comparable to the Maxus MIFA 9 at 115 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Mercedes-Benz eSprinter is listed at about 42 minutes, roughly matching the Maxus MIFA 9. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.

Range and Efficiency

The Mercedes-Benz eSprinter has a WLTP rated range of approximately 440 km, which is roughly 40 km more than the Maxus MIFA 9 at approximately 400 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Maxus MIFA 9 consumes 233 Wh/km, compared to 342 Wh/km for the Mercedes-Benz eSprinter. That means the Maxus MIFA 9 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mercedes-Benz eSprinter has approximately 113 kWh of useable battery , while the Maxus MIFA 9 has approximately 84 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 115 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.

Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Maxus MIFA 9 is the more efficient choice at 233 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Mercedes-Benz eSprinter has a WLTP rated range of approximately 440 km, which is roughly 40 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Related scenarios

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Download on the App Store

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.