Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Ford Puma Gen-E vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV

Compared variants: Standard vs 450+

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, but the published charge-time data matters more for road-trip stops. The Ford Puma Gen-E is listed at about 23 minutes versus 33 minutes for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV. The Ford Puma Gen-E is more efficient at approximately 159 Wh/km. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV offers more WLTP rated range at 720 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Ford Puma Gen-E Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Compared variant Standard 450+
Battery (approx.) ~43.6 kWh ~118 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~376 km ~720 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~159 Wh/km ~219 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 100 kW up to 200 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~23 min ~33 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW (22 kW optional)
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, which is roughly 100% higher than the Ford Puma Gen-E at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Ford Puma Gen-E is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 10 minutes quicker than the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV at 33 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has a WLTP rated range of approximately 720 km, which is roughly 344 km more than the Ford Puma Gen-E at approximately 376 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Puma Gen-E consumes 159 Wh/km, compared to 219 Wh/km for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV. That means the Ford Puma Gen-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has approximately 118 kWh of useable battery , while the Ford Puma Gen-E has approximately 43.6 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the higher published DC figure at up to 200 kW, but the Ford Puma Gen-E has the shorter published charge time at approximately 23 minutes versus approximately 33 minutes. On road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 11 kW for the Ford Puma Gen-E. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Puma Gen-E is the more efficient choice at 159 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has a WLTP rated range of approximately 720 km, which is roughly 344 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.