Charging Comparison
Ford Puma Gen-E vs Jeep Avenger Electric
Compared variants: Standard vs Standard
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 100 kW. The Ford Puma Gen-E is more efficient at approximately 159 Wh/km. The Jeep Avenger Electric offers more WLTP rated range at 400 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Ford Puma Gen-E | Jeep Avenger Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Standard | Standard |
| Battery (approx.) | ~43.6 kWh | ~50.8 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~376 km | ~400 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~159 Wh/km | ~164 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 100 kW | up to 100 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~23 min | ~27 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Jeep Avenger Electric has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, which is comparable to the Ford Puma Gen-E at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Ford Puma Gen-E is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 4 minutes quicker than the Jeep Avenger Electric at 27 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Jeep Avenger Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 400 km, which is roughly 24 km more than the Ford Puma Gen-E at approximately 376 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Puma Gen-E consumes 159 Wh/km, compared to 164 Wh/km for the Jeep Avenger Electric. That means the Ford Puma Gen-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Jeep Avenger Electric has approximately 50.8 kWh of useable battery , while the Ford Puma Gen-E has approximately 43.6 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 100 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Puma Gen-E is the more efficient choice at 159 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Jeep Avenger Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 400 km, which is roughly 24 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Related scenarios
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.