Charging Comparison
Citroën ë-C3 vs Fiat Grande Panda
Compared variants: 44 kWh vs Standard
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 100 kW. The Fiat Grande Panda is more efficient at approximately 168 Wh/km. The Citroën ë-C3 offers more WLTP rated range at 326 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Citroën ë-C3 | Fiat Grande Panda |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 44 kWh | Standard |
| Battery (approx.) | ~44 kWh | ~44 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~326 km | ~320 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~172 Wh/km | ~168 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 100 kW | up to 100 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~26 min | ~26 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 7.4 kW | up to 7.4 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Fiat Grande Panda has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 100 kW, which is comparable to the Citroën ë-C3 at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Fiat Grande Panda finishes in about 26 minutes, roughly matching the Citroën ë-C3. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Citroën ë-C3 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 326 km, which is roughly 6 km more than the Fiat Grande Panda at approximately 320 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Fiat Grande Panda consumes 168 Wh/km, compared to 172 Wh/km for the Citroën ë-C3. That means the Fiat Grande Panda uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Citroën ë-C3 has approximately 44 kWh of useable battery , matching its rival.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 100 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
Both cars support 7.4 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Fiat Grande Panda is the more efficient choice at 168 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Citroën ë-C3 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 326 km, which is roughly 6 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.