Charging Comparison
BYD ATTO 2 vs Ford Puma Gen-E
Compared variants: Standard vs Standard
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Ford Puma Gen-E has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, while the Ford Puma Gen-E is more efficient at approximately 159 Wh/km. The Ford Puma Gen-E offers more WLTP rated range at 376 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | BYD ATTO 2 | Ford Puma Gen-E |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Standard | Standard |
| Battery (approx.) | ~45.12 kWh | ~43.6 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~312 km | ~376 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~184 Wh/km | ~159 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 65 kW | up to 100 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~37 min | ~23 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Ford Puma Gen-E has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, which is roughly 54% higher than the BYD ATTO 2 at 65 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Ford Puma Gen-E is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 14 minutes quicker than the BYD ATTO 2 at 37 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Ford Puma Gen-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 376 km, which is roughly 64 km more than the BYD ATTO 2 at approximately 312 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Puma Gen-E consumes 159 Wh/km, compared to 184 Wh/km for the BYD ATTO 2. That means the Ford Puma Gen-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Ford Puma Gen-E has approximately 43.6 kWh of useable battery , while the BYD ATTO 2 has approximately 45.12 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Ford Puma Gen-E has the higher published DC figure (up to 100 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 23 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Puma Gen-E is the more efficient choice at 159 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Ford Puma Gen-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 376 km, which is roughly 64 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.