Charging Comparison
Volvo ES90 vs XPENG P7
Compared variants: Twin Motor vs RWD Long Range
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, while the XPENG P7 is more efficient at approximately 167 Wh/km. The Volvo ES90 offers more WLTP rated range at 700 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Volvo ES90 | XPENG P7 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Twin Motor | RWD Long Range |
| Battery (approx.) | ~102 kWh | ~82.7 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~700 km | ~580 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~191 Wh/km | ~167 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 350 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~23 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, which is roughly 100% higher than the XPENG P7 at 175 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Volvo ES90 is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 5 minutes quicker than the XPENG P7 at 28 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo ES90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 700 km, which is roughly 120 km more than the XPENG P7 at approximately 580 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The XPENG P7 consumes 167 Wh/km, compared to 191 Wh/km for the Volvo ES90. That means the XPENG P7 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo ES90 has approximately 102 kWh of useable battery , while the XPENG P7 has approximately 82.7 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC figure (up to 350 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 23 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the XPENG P7 is the more efficient choice at 167 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo ES90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 700 km, which is roughly 120 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.