Charging Comparison
Tesla Model S vs Volvo ES90
Compared variants: Dual Motor vs Twin Motor
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, while the Tesla Model S is more efficient at approximately 148 Wh/km. The Tesla Model S offers more WLTP rated range at 744 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Tesla Model S | Volvo ES90 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Dual Motor | Twin Motor |
| Battery (approx.) | ~95 kWh | ~102 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~744 km | ~700 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~148 Wh/km | ~191 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 250 kW | up to 350 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~23 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, which is roughly 40% higher than the Tesla Model S at 250 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Volvo ES90 is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 7 minutes quicker than the Tesla Model S at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Tesla Model S has a WLTP rated range of approximately 744 km, which is roughly 44 km more than the Volvo ES90 at approximately 700 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Tesla Model S consumes 148 Wh/km, compared to 191 Wh/km for the Volvo ES90. That means the Tesla Model S uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Tesla Model S has approximately 95 kWh of useable battery , while the Volvo ES90 has approximately 102 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo ES90 has the higher published DC figure (up to 350 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 23 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Tesla Model S is the more efficient choice at 148 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Tesla Model S has a WLTP rated range of approximately 744 km, which is roughly 44 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.