Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo EX40 charges faster with a peak of 200 kW DC, while the Volkswagen ID.4 is more efficient at 173 Wh/km. The Volkswagen ID.4 offers more range at 445 km in real-world driving.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Volkswagen ID.4 | Volvo EX40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 77 kWh | 79 kWh |
| Real-world range | 445 km | 400 km |
| Efficiency | 173 Wh/km | 198 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | 175 kW | 200 kW |
| 10-80% charge time | 28 min | 28 min |
| Max AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| AC phase | 3-phase | 3-phase |
| Voltage architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Heat pump | Optional | Standard |
| Preconditioning | Yes | Yes |
| Plug & Charge | Yes | No |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EX40 has a peak DC charging speed of 200 kW, which is roughly 14% faster than the Volkswagen ID.4 at 175 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
Both cars use 400V architecture, so their charging curves should follow similar patterns. The difference in peak speed comes down to battery chemistry, thermal management, and the onboard charger design.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Volvo EX40 finishes in about 28 minutes, roughly matching the Volkswagen ID.4. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volkswagen ID.4 offers 445 km of real-world range, which is 45 km more than the Volvo EX40 at 400 km. These are real-world estimates, not WLTP numbers. Expect your actual range to vary with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Volkswagen ID.4 consumes 173 Wh/km, compared to 198 Wh/km for the Volvo EX40. That means the Volkswagen ID.4 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volkswagen ID.4 has a 77 kWh useable battery , while the Volvo EX40 has 79 kWh.
Cold Weather Charging
The Volvo EX40 comes with a heat pump as standard, giving it an advantage in cold weather efficiency. The Volkswagen ID.4 offers a heat pump as an option.
Battery preconditioning is equally important for winter DC fast charging. When the battery is cold, charging speeds drop significantly. Both cars support preconditioning, which warms the battery before you arrive at a fast charger so you get closer to peak charging speed.
In cold conditions, expect 20-35% range loss compared to ideal weather. Cars with both a heat pump and preconditioning typically handle winter better overall.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Volvo EX40 has the edge with 200 kW peak DC and a 28-minute 10-80% time. For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Volkswagen ID.4 is the more efficient choice at 173 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volkswagen ID.4 gives you 445 km of real-world range, which is 45 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
Stuck at the charger? Open the app.
Step-by-step help for real charging problems. Log the experience. Free on iOS and Android.
Free to download · Available on iOS and Android