Charging Comparison
Toyota bZ4X vs Volvo EX90
Compared variants: Touring AWD 74.7 kWh (MY26) vs Twin Motor
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo EX90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, while the Toyota bZ4X is more efficient at approximately 153 Wh/km. The Volvo EX90 offers more WLTP rated range at 622 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Toyota bZ4X | Volvo EX90 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Touring AWD 74.7 kWh (MY26) | Twin Motor |
| Battery (approx.) | ~71 kWh | ~102 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~528 km | ~622 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~153 Wh/km | ~213 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 150 kW | up to 350 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~29 min | ~23 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 22 kW | up to 11 kW (22 kW optional) |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EX90 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, which is roughly 133% higher than the Toyota bZ4X at 150 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Volvo EX90 is listed at about 23 minutes, which is 6 minutes quicker than the Toyota bZ4X at 29 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 622 km, which is roughly 94 km more than the Toyota bZ4X at approximately 528 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Toyota bZ4X consumes 153 Wh/km, compared to 213 Wh/km for the Volvo EX90. That means the Toyota bZ4X uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo EX90 has approximately 102 kWh of useable battery , while the Toyota bZ4X has approximately 71 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo EX90 has the higher published DC figure (up to 350 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 23 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 22 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Toyota bZ4X is the more efficient choice at 153 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo EX90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 622 km, which is roughly 94 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.