Charging Comparison
Honda e:Ny1 vs Volvo EC40
Compared variants: 68.8 kWh vs Single Motor ER
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo EC40 has the higher published DC charging figure at 207 kW, while the Volvo EC40 is more efficient at approximately 162 Wh/km. The Volvo EC40 offers more WLTP rated range at 583 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Honda e:Ny1 | Volvo EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 68.8 kWh | Single Motor ER |
| Battery (approx.) | ~61.9 kWh | ~79 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~412 km | ~583 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~182 Wh/km | ~162 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 78 kW | up to 207 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~46 min | ~32 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EC40 has the higher published DC charging figure at 207 kW, which is roughly 165% higher than the Honda e:Ny1 at 78 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Volvo EC40 is listed at about 32 minutes, which is 14 minutes quicker than the Honda e:Ny1 at 46 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EC40 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 583 km, which is roughly 171 km more than the Honda e:Ny1 at approximately 412 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Volvo EC40 consumes 162 Wh/km, compared to 182 Wh/km for the Honda e:Ny1. That means the Volvo EC40 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo EC40 has approximately 79 kWh of useable battery , while the Honda e:Ny1 has approximately 61.9 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo EC40 has the higher published DC figure (up to 207 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 32 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Volvo EC40 is the more efficient choice at 162 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo EC40 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 583 km, which is roughly 171 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.