Charging Comparison
Honda e:Ny1 vs Toyota C-HR+
Compared variants: 68.8 kWh vs 77 kWh FWD
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Toyota C-HR+ has the higher published DC charging figure at 150 kW, while the Toyota C-HR+ is more efficient at approximately 167 Wh/km. The Toyota C-HR+ offers more WLTP rated range at 514 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Honda e:Ny1 | Toyota C-HR+ |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 68.8 kWh | 77 kWh FWD |
| Battery (approx.) | ~61.9 kWh | ~72 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~412 km | ~514 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~182 Wh/km | ~167 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 78 kW | up to 150 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~46 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Toyota C-HR+ has the higher published DC charging figure at 150 kW, which is roughly 92% higher than the Honda e:Ny1 at 78 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Toyota C-HR+ is listed at about 30 minutes, which is 16 minutes quicker than the Honda e:Ny1 at 46 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Toyota C-HR+ has a WLTP rated range of approximately 514 km, which is roughly 102 km more than the Honda e:Ny1 at approximately 412 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Toyota C-HR+ consumes 167 Wh/km, compared to 182 Wh/km for the Honda e:Ny1. That means the Toyota C-HR+ uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Toyota C-HR+ has approximately 72 kWh of useable battery , while the Honda e:Ny1 has approximately 61.9 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Toyota C-HR+ has the higher published DC figure (up to 150 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 30 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Toyota C-HR+ is the more efficient choice at 167 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Toyota C-HR+ has a WLTP rated range of approximately 514 km, which is roughly 102 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.