Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Ford E-Transit vs Peugeot e-Expert

Compared variants: 68 kWh (MY24+) vs e-Expert Long 75 kWh

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Ford E-Transit has the higher published DC charging figure at 115 kW, while the Ford E-Transit is more efficient at approximately 272 Wh/km. The Peugeot e-Expert offers more WLTP rated range at 330 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Ford E-Transit Peugeot e-Expert
Compared variant 68 kWh (MY24+) e-Expert Long 75 kWh
Battery (approx.) ~68 kWh ~75 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~317 km ~330 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~272 Wh/km ~300 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 115 kW up to 100 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~34 min ~45 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Ford E-Transit has the higher published DC charging figure at 115 kW, which is roughly 15% higher than the Peugeot e-Expert at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Ford E-Transit is listed at about 34 minutes, which is 11 minutes quicker than the Peugeot e-Expert at 45 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Peugeot e-Expert has a WLTP rated range of approximately 330 km, which is roughly 13 km more than the Ford E-Transit at approximately 317 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford E-Transit consumes 272 Wh/km, compared to 300 Wh/km for the Peugeot e-Expert. That means the Ford E-Transit uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Peugeot e-Expert has approximately 75 kWh of useable battery , while the Ford E-Transit has approximately 68 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Ford E-Transit has the higher published DC figure (up to 115 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 34 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford E-Transit is the more efficient choice at 272 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Peugeot e-Expert has a WLTP rated range of approximately 330 km, which is roughly 13 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.