Charging Comparison
BYD ATTO 3 vs Volvo EX60
Compared variants: 60.5 kWh vs P10 AWD
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo EX60 has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 250 kW, while the Volvo EX60 is more efficient at approximately 182 Wh/km. The Volvo EX60 offers more WLTP rated range at 580 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | BYD ATTO 3 | Volvo EX60 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 60.5 kWh | P10 AWD |
| Battery (approx.) | ~60.5 kWh | ~91 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~420 km | ~580 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~183 Wh/km | ~182 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 89 kW | up to 250 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~38 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EX60 has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 250 kW, which is roughly 181% higher than the BYD ATTO 3 at 89 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Volvo EX60 finishes in about 28 minutes, which is 10 minutes quicker than the BYD ATTO 3 at 38 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo EX60 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 580 km, which is roughly 160 km more than the BYD ATTO 3 at approximately 420 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Volvo EX60 consumes 182 Wh/km, compared to 183 Wh/km for the BYD ATTO 3. That means the Volvo EX60 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo EX60 has approximately 91 kWh of useable battery , while the BYD ATTO 3 has approximately 60.5 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Volvo EX60 has the higher published DC figure (up to 250 kW) while matching the quickest published 10-80% time at approximately 28 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Volvo EX60 is the more efficient choice at 182 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo EX60 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 580 km, which is roughly 160 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.