Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Volvo EC40 charges faster with a peak of 200 kW DC, while the Audi Q4 e-tron is more efficient at 179 Wh/km. The Audi Q4 e-tron offers more WLTP rated range at 562 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Audi Q4 e-tron | Volvo EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~77 kWh | ~79 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~562 km | ~500 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~179 Wh/km | ~188 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 175 kW | up to 200 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~28 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EC40 has a peak DC charging speed of 200 kW, which is roughly 14% faster than the Audi Q4 e-tron at 175 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Volvo EC40 finishes in about 28 minutes, roughly matching the Audi Q4 e-tron. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Audi Q4 e-tron has a WLTP rated range of approximately 562 km, which is roughly 62 km more than the Volvo EC40 at approximately 500 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Audi Q4 e-tron consumes 179 Wh/km, compared to 188 Wh/km for the Volvo EC40. That means the Audi Q4 e-tron uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Audi Q4 e-tron has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the Volvo EC40 has approximately 79 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Volvo EC40 wins on both peak power (up to 200 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 28 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Audi Q4 e-tron is the more efficient choice at 179 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a WLTP rated range of approximately 562 km, which is roughly 62 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.