Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Audi e-tron GT charges faster with a peak of 270 kW DC, while the Volvo ES90 is more efficient at 191 Wh/km. The Volvo ES90 offers more WLTP rated range at 620 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Audi e-tron GT | Volvo ES90 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~83.7 kWh | ~102 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~488 km | ~620 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~202 Wh/km | ~191 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 270 kW | up to 250 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~18 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Audi e-tron GT has a peak DC charging speed of 270 kW, which is roughly 8% faster than the Volvo ES90 at 250 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Audi e-tron GT finishes in about 18 minutes, which is 12 minutes quicker than the Volvo ES90 at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Volvo ES90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 620 km, which is roughly 132 km more than the Audi e-tron GT at approximately 488 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Volvo ES90 consumes 191 Wh/km, compared to 202 Wh/km for the Audi e-tron GT. That means the Volvo ES90 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Volvo ES90 has approximately 102 kWh of useable battery , while the Audi e-tron GT has approximately 83.7 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Audi e-tron GT wins on both peak power (up to 270 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 18 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Volvo ES90 is the more efficient choice at 191 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Volvo ES90 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 620 km, which is roughly 132 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.