Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars peak at 100 kW DC charging. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric is more efficient at 156 Wh/km. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric offers more WLTP rated range at 403 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Alpine A290 | Lancia Ypsilon Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~52 kWh | ~51 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~380 km | ~403 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~170 Wh/km | ~156 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 100 kW | up to 100 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~27 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Lancia Ypsilon Electric has a peak DC charging speed of 100 kW, which is comparable to the Alpine A290 at 100 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Lancia Ypsilon Electric finishes in about 27 minutes, which is 3 minutes quicker than the Alpine A290 at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Lancia Ypsilon Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 403 km, which is roughly 23 km more than the Alpine A290 at approximately 380 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric consumes 156 Wh/km, compared to 170 Wh/km for the Alpine A290. That means the Lancia Ypsilon Electric uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric has approximately 51 kWh of useable battery , while the Alpine A290 has approximately 52 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars offer similar DC fast charging at 100 kW peak. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Lancia Ypsilon Electric is the more efficient choice at 156 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Lancia Ypsilon Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 403 km, which is roughly 23 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Related scenarios
- Alpine A290 vs Volkswagen ID.3 →
- Lancia Ypsilon Electric vs Volkswagen ID.3 →
- Alpine A290 vs Renault 5 E-Tech →
- Lancia Ypsilon Electric vs Renault 5 E-Tech →
- Alpine A290 vs Renault Megane E-Tech →
- Lancia Ypsilon Electric vs Renault Megane E-Tech →
- Alpine A290 charging time →
- Lancia Ypsilon Electric charging time →
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.