Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Lancia Ypsilon Electric vs Renault Megane E-Tech

Compared variants: 54 kWh vs EV60 220hp

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the higher published DC charging figure at 129 kW, but the published charge-time data matters more for road-trip stops. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric is listed at about 27 minutes versus 33 minutes for the Renault Megane E-Tech. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric is more efficient at approximately 156 Wh/km. The Renault Megane E-Tech offers more WLTP rated range at 450 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Lancia Ypsilon Electric Renault Megane E-Tech
Compared variant 54 kWh EV60 220hp
Battery (approx.) ~51 kWh ~60 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~403 km ~450 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~156 Wh/km ~158 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 100 kW up to 129 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~27 min ~33 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 22 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the higher published DC charging figure at 129 kW, which is roughly 29% higher than the Lancia Ypsilon Electric at 100 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Lancia Ypsilon Electric is listed at about 27 minutes, which is 6 minutes quicker than the Renault Megane E-Tech at 33 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Renault Megane E-Tech has a WLTP rated range of approximately 450 km, which is roughly 47 km more than the Lancia Ypsilon Electric at approximately 403 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Lancia Ypsilon Electric consumes 156 Wh/km, compared to 158 Wh/km for the Renault Megane E-Tech. That means the Lancia Ypsilon Electric uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Renault Megane E-Tech has approximately 60 kWh of useable battery , while the Lancia Ypsilon Electric has approximately 51 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

The Renault Megane E-Tech has the higher published DC figure at up to 129 kW, but the Lancia Ypsilon Electric has the shorter published charge time at approximately 27 minutes versus approximately 33 minutes. On road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Renault Megane E-Tech supports up to 22 kW, compared to up to 11 kW for the Lancia Ypsilon Electric. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Lancia Ypsilon Electric is the more efficient choice at 156 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Renault Megane E-Tech has a WLTP rated range of approximately 450 km, which is roughly 47 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.