Charging Comparison
Toyota C-HR+ vs XPENG G6
Compared variants: 77 kWh FWD vs RWD Long Range
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The XPENG G6 has the higher published DC charging figure at 280 kW, while the Toyota C-HR+ is more efficient at approximately 167 Wh/km. The XPENG G6 offers more WLTP rated range at 520 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Toyota C-HR+ | XPENG G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 77 kWh FWD | RWD Long Range |
| Battery (approx.) | ~72 kWh | ~80 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~514 km | ~520 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~167 Wh/km | ~184 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 150 kW | up to 280 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~20 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The XPENG G6 has the higher published DC charging figure at 280 kW, which is roughly 87% higher than the Toyota C-HR+ at 150 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the XPENG G6 is listed at about 20 minutes, which is 10 minutes quicker than the Toyota C-HR+ at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The XPENG G6 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 520 km, which is roughly 6 km more than the Toyota C-HR+ at approximately 514 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Toyota C-HR+ consumes 167 Wh/km, compared to 184 Wh/km for the XPENG G6. That means the Toyota C-HR+ uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The XPENG G6 has approximately 80 kWh of useable battery , while the Toyota C-HR+ has approximately 72 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the XPENG G6 has the higher published DC figure (up to 280 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 20 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Toyota C-HR+ is the more efficient choice at 167 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the XPENG G6 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 520 km, which is roughly 6 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.