Charging Comparison
Škoda Elroq vs Volkswagen ID.5
Compared variants: 85 vs Pro
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 175 kW. The Škoda Elroq is more efficient at approximately 152 Wh/km. The Škoda Elroq offers more WLTP rated range at 573 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Škoda Elroq | Volkswagen ID.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 85 | Pro |
| Battery (approx.) | ~77 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~573 km | ~567 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~152 Wh/km | ~169 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 175 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~28 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volkswagen ID.5 has the higher published DC charging figure at 175 kW, which is comparable to the Škoda Elroq at 175 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Volkswagen ID.5 is listed at about 28 minutes, roughly matching the Škoda Elroq. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 6 km more than the Volkswagen ID.5 at approximately 567 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Škoda Elroq consumes 152 Wh/km, compared to 169 Wh/km for the Volkswagen ID.5. That means the Škoda Elroq uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Elroq has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , matching its rival.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 175 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Škoda Elroq is the more efficient choice at 152 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 6 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.