Charging Comparison
Peugeot e-3008 vs Škoda Elroq
Compared variants: 73 kWh vs 85
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 175 kW, while the Škoda Elroq is more efficient at approximately 171 Wh/km. The Škoda Elroq offers more WLTP rated range at 537 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Peugeot e-3008 | Škoda Elroq |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 73 kWh | 85 |
| Battery (approx.) | ~73 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~450 km | ~537 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~192 Wh/km | ~171 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 160 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~27 min | ~26 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 175 kW, which is roughly 9% higher than the Peugeot e-3008 at 160 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Škoda Elroq finishes in about 26 minutes, which is 1 minutes quicker than the Peugeot e-3008 at 27 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 537 km, which is roughly 87 km more than the Peugeot e-3008 at approximately 450 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Škoda Elroq consumes 171 Wh/km, compared to 192 Wh/km for the Peugeot e-3008. That means the Škoda Elroq uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Elroq has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the Peugeot e-3008 has approximately 73 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC figure (up to 175 kW) while matching the quickest published 10-80% time at approximately 26 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Škoda Elroq is the more efficient choice at 171 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 537 km, which is roughly 87 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.