Charging Comparison
Peugeot e-2008 vs Škoda Enyaq
Compared variants: 54 kWh vs 85
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Škoda Enyaq has the higher published DC charging figure at 135 kW, but both cars are listed at about 28 minutes for the published fast-charge window. The Škoda Enyaq is more efficient at approximately 169 Wh/km. The Škoda Enyaq offers more WLTP rated range at 586 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Peugeot e-2008 | Škoda Enyaq |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 54 kWh | 85 |
| Battery (approx.) | ~50.8 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~406 km | ~586 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~169 Wh/km | ~169 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 107 kW | up to 135 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~28 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 7.4 kW (11 kW optional) | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Škoda Enyaq has the higher published DC charging figure at 135 kW, which is roughly 26% higher than the Peugeot e-2008 at 107 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Škoda Enyaq is listed at about 28 minutes, roughly matching the Peugeot e-2008. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Enyaq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 586 km, which is roughly 180 km more than the Peugeot e-2008 at approximately 406 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Škoda Enyaq consumes 169 Wh/km, compared to 169 Wh/km for the Peugeot e-2008. That means the Škoda Enyaq uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Enyaq has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the Peugeot e-2008 has approximately 50.8 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Škoda Enyaq has the higher published DC figure (up to 135 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 28 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 7.4 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
Both cars have similar efficiency at 169 Wh/km, so daily charging costs should be comparable.
For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Enyaq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 586 km, which is roughly 180 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.