Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Opel Grandland Electric vs Peugeot e-5008

Compared variants: 73 kWh vs 73 kWh

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 160 kW. The Peugeot e-5008 is more efficient at approximately 197 Wh/km. The Opel Grandland Electric offers more WLTP rated range at 523 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Opel Grandland Electric Peugeot e-5008
Compared variant 73 kWh 73 kWh
Battery (approx.) ~73 kWh ~73 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~523 km ~440 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~197 Wh/km ~197 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 160 kW up to 160 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~29 min ~27 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Peugeot e-5008 has the higher published DC charging figure at 160 kW, which is comparable to the Opel Grandland Electric at 160 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Peugeot e-5008 is listed at about 27 minutes, which is 2 minutes quicker than the Opel Grandland Electric at 29 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Opel Grandland Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 523 km, which is roughly 83 km more than the Peugeot e-5008 at approximately 440 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Peugeot e-5008 consumes 197 Wh/km, compared to 197 Wh/km for the Opel Grandland Electric. That means the Peugeot e-5008 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Opel Grandland Electric has approximately 73 kWh of useable battery , matching its rival.

Which One Should You Choose?

Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 160 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.

Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.

Both cars have similar efficiency at 197 Wh/km, so daily charging costs should be comparable.

For maximum range between charges, the Opel Grandland Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 523 km, which is roughly 83 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.