Mini Aceman vs Peugeot e-308

Side-by-Side Specs

Charging Speed

The Peugeot e-308 has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, which is roughly 5% higher than the Mini Aceman at 95 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Peugeot e-308 is listed at about 30 minutes, roughly matching the Mini Aceman. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.

Range and Efficiency

The Peugeot e-308 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 410 km, which is roughly 60 km more than the Mini Aceman at approximately 350 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Peugeot e-308 consumes 161 Wh/km, compared to 170 Wh/km for the Mini Aceman. That means the Peugeot e-308 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Peugeot e-308 has approximately 55.4 kWh of useable battery , while the Mini Aceman has approximately 49.2 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Peugeot e-308 has the higher published DC figure (up to 100 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 30 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Peugeot e-308 is the more efficient choice at 161 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Peugeot e-308 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 410 km, which is roughly 60 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.