Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV vs Suzuki e VITARA

Compared variants: 350+ vs 61 kWh 2WD

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has the higher published DC charging figure at 173 kW, but the published charge-time data matters more for road-trip stops. The Suzuki e VITARA is listed at about 25 minutes versus 30 minutes for the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV. The Suzuki e VITARA is more efficient at approximately 181 Wh/km. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV offers more WLTP rated range at 611 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV Suzuki e VITARA
Compared variant 350+ 61 kWh 2WD
Battery (approx.) ~96 kWh ~59.8 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~611 km ~400 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~202 Wh/km ~181 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 173 kW up to 150 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~30 min ~25 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW (22 kW optional) up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has the higher published DC charging figure at 173 kW, which is roughly 15% higher than the Suzuki e VITARA at 150 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Suzuki e VITARA is listed at about 25 minutes, which is 5 minutes quicker than the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has a WLTP rated range of approximately 611 km, which is roughly 211 km more than the Suzuki e VITARA at approximately 400 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Suzuki e VITARA consumes 181 Wh/km, compared to 202 Wh/km for the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV. That means the Suzuki e VITARA uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has approximately 96 kWh of useable battery , while the Suzuki e VITARA has approximately 59.8 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has the higher published DC figure at up to 173 kW, but the Suzuki e VITARA has the shorter published charge time at approximately 25 minutes versus approximately 30 minutes. On road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 11 kW for the Suzuki e VITARA. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Suzuki e VITARA is the more efficient choice at 181 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has a WLTP rated range of approximately 611 km, which is roughly 211 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.