Charging Comparison
Leapmotor C10 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric
Compared variants: RWD 81.9 kWh vs 400 4MATIC
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC charging figure at 330 kW, while the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric is more efficient at approximately 188 Wh/km. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric offers more WLTP rated range at 715 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Leapmotor C10 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | RWD 81.9 kWh | 400 4MATIC |
| Battery (approx.) | ~81.9 kWh | ~94 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~490 km | ~715 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~200 Wh/km | ~188 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 84 kW | up to 330 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~50 min | ~22 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 6.6 kW | up to 11 kW (22 kW optional) |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC charging figure at 330 kW, which is roughly 293% higher than the Leapmotor C10 at 84 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric is listed at about 22 minutes, which is 28 minutes quicker than the Leapmotor C10 at 50 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 715 km, which is roughly 225 km more than the Leapmotor C10 at approximately 490 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric consumes 188 Wh/km, compared to 200 Wh/km for the Leapmotor C10. That means the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has approximately 94 kWh of useable battery , while the Leapmotor C10 has approximately 81.9 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC figure (up to 330 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 22 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 6.6 kW for the Leapmotor C10. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric is the more efficient choice at 188 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 715 km, which is roughly 225 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Related scenarios
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.