Charging Comparison
KGM Torres EVX vs Škoda Elroq
Compared variants: 80.6 kWh vs 85
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC charging figure at 175 kW, while the Škoda Elroq is more efficient at approximately 152 Wh/km. The Škoda Elroq offers more WLTP rated range at 573 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | KGM Torres EVX | Škoda Elroq |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 80.6 kWh | 85 |
| Battery (approx.) | ~72 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~462 km | ~573 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~198 Wh/km | ~152 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 150 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~33 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC charging figure at 175 kW, which is roughly 17% higher than the KGM Torres EVX at 150 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Škoda Elroq is listed at about 28 minutes, which is 5 minutes quicker than the KGM Torres EVX at 33 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 111 km more than the KGM Torres EVX at approximately 462 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Škoda Elroq consumes 152 Wh/km, compared to 198 Wh/km for the KGM Torres EVX. That means the Škoda Elroq uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Elroq has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the KGM Torres EVX has approximately 72 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC figure (up to 175 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 28 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Škoda Elroq is the more efficient choice at 152 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 111 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.