Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Hyundai INSTER charges faster with a peak of 120 kW DC, while the Renault Twingo E-Tech is more efficient at 149 Wh/km. The Hyundai INSTER offers more WLTP rated range at 370 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Hyundai INSTER | Renault Twingo E-Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~46 kWh | ~28 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~370 km | ~250 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~153 Wh/km | ~149 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 120 kW | up to 50 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~25 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 7.4 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Hyundai INSTER has a peak DC charging speed of 120 kW, which is roughly 140% faster than the Renault Twingo E-Tech at 50 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Hyundai INSTER finishes in about 25 minutes, which is 5 minutes quicker than the Renault Twingo E-Tech at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Hyundai INSTER has a WLTP rated range of approximately 370 km, which is roughly 120 km more than the Renault Twingo E-Tech at approximately 250 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Renault Twingo E-Tech consumes 149 Wh/km, compared to 153 Wh/km for the Hyundai INSTER. That means the Renault Twingo E-Tech uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Hyundai INSTER has approximately 46 kWh of useable battery , while the Renault Twingo E-Tech has approximately 28 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Hyundai INSTER wins on both peak power (up to 120 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 25 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Hyundai INSTER supports up to 11 kW, compared to 7.4 kW for the Renault Twingo E-Tech. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Renault Twingo E-Tech is the more efficient choice at 149 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Hyundai INSTER has a WLTP rated range of approximately 370 km, which is roughly 120 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Related scenarios
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.