Charging Comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Peugeot e-2008
Compared variants: Extended Range RWD vs 54 kWh
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 150 kW, but the Peugeot e-2008 actually finishes the 10-80% charge just as fast (28 min) in the current published data. The Peugeot e-2008 is more efficient at approximately 169 Wh/km. The Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more WLTP rated range at 600 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Peugeot e-2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Extended Range RWD | 54 kWh |
| Battery (approx.) | ~92 kWh | ~50.8 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~600 km | ~406 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~189 Wh/km | ~169 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 150 kW | up to 107 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~46 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 7.4 kW (11 kW optional) |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 150 kW, which is roughly 40% higher than the Peugeot e-2008 at 107 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Peugeot e-2008 finishes in about 28 minutes, which is 18 minutes quicker than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 46 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 194 km more than the Peugeot e-2008 at approximately 406 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Peugeot e-2008 consumes 169 Wh/km, compared to 189 Wh/km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That means the Peugeot e-2008 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has approximately 92 kWh of useable battery , while the Peugeot e-2008 has approximately 50.8 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC figure at up to 150 kW, but the Peugeot e-2008 actually finishes the 10-80% charge faster at approximately 28 minutes versus approximately 46 minutes. On road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Ford Mustang Mach-E supports up to 11 kW, compared to 7.4 kW for the Peugeot e-2008. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Peugeot e-2008 is the more efficient choice at 169 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 194 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.