Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz EQA

Compared variants: Extended Range RWD vs 250+

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC charging figure at 150 kW, but both cars are listed at about 35 minutes for the published fast-charge window. The Mercedes-Benz EQA is more efficient at approximately 168 Wh/km. The Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more WLTP rated range at 600 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Ford Mustang Mach-E Mercedes-Benz EQA
Compared variant Extended Range RWD 250+
Battery (approx.) ~91 kWh ~70.5 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~600 km ~560 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~189 Wh/km ~168 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 150 kW up to 102 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~35 min ~35 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW (22 kW optional)
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC charging figure at 150 kW, which is roughly 47% higher than the Mercedes-Benz EQA at 102 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Mercedes-Benz EQA is listed at about 35 minutes, roughly matching the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.

Range and Efficiency

The Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 40 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA at approximately 560 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Mercedes-Benz EQA consumes 168 Wh/km, compared to 189 Wh/km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That means the Mercedes-Benz EQA uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has approximately 91 kWh of useable battery , while the Mercedes-Benz EQA has approximately 70.5 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has the higher published DC figure (up to 150 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 35 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Mercedes-Benz EQA supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 11 kW for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Mercedes-Benz EQA is the more efficient choice at 168 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 40 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.