Charging Comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs KGM Torres EVX
Compared variants: Extended Range RWD vs 80.6 kWh
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 150 kW. The Ford Mustang Mach-E is more efficient at approximately 190 Wh/km. The Ford Mustang Mach-E offers more WLTP rated range at 600 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Ford Mustang Mach-E | KGM Torres EVX |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Extended Range RWD | 80.6 kWh |
| Battery (approx.) | ~91 kWh | ~72 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~600 km | ~462 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~190 Wh/km | ~198 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 150 kW | up to 150 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~35 min | ~33 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The KGM Torres EVX has the higher published DC charging figure at 150 kW, which is comparable to the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 150 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the KGM Torres EVX is listed at about 33 minutes, which is 2 minutes quicker than the Ford Mustang Mach-E at 35 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 138 km more than the KGM Torres EVX at approximately 462 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Ford Mustang Mach-E consumes 190 Wh/km, compared to 198 Wh/km for the KGM Torres EVX. That means the Ford Mustang Mach-E uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has approximately 91 kWh of useable battery , while the KGM Torres EVX has approximately 72 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 150 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more efficient choice at 190 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a WLTP rated range of approximately 600 km, which is roughly 138 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.