Charging Comparison
CUPRA Tavascan vs Škoda Elroq
Compared variants: Endurance vs 85
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC charging figure at 175 kW, but both cars are listed at about 28 minutes for the published fast-charge window. The CUPRA Tavascan is more efficient at approximately 151 Wh/km. The Škoda Elroq offers more WLTP rated range at 573 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | CUPRA Tavascan | Škoda Elroq |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | Endurance | 85 |
| Battery (approx.) | ~77 kWh | ~77 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~568 km | ~573 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~151 Wh/km | ~152 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 135 kW | up to 175 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~28 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC charging figure at 175 kW, which is roughly 30% higher than the CUPRA Tavascan at 135 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Škoda Elroq is listed at about 28 minutes, roughly matching the CUPRA Tavascan. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.
Range and Efficiency
The Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 5 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan at approximately 568 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The CUPRA Tavascan consumes 151 Wh/km, compared to 152 Wh/km for the Škoda Elroq. That means the CUPRA Tavascan uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Elroq has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , matching its rival.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Škoda Elroq has the higher published DC figure (up to 175 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 28 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the CUPRA Tavascan is the more efficient choice at 151 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Elroq has a WLTP rated range of approximately 573 km, which is roughly 5 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.