Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

CUPRA Tavascan vs Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric

Compared variants: Endurance vs 400 4MATIC

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC charging figure at 330 kW, while the CUPRA Tavascan is more efficient at approximately 151 Wh/km. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric offers more WLTP rated range at 715 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec CUPRA Tavascan Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric
Compared variant Endurance 400 4MATIC
Battery (approx.) ~77 kWh ~94 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~568 km ~715 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~151 Wh/km ~188 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 135 kW up to 330 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~28 min ~22 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW (22 kW optional)
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC charging figure at 330 kW, which is roughly 144% higher than the CUPRA Tavascan at 135 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric is listed at about 22 minutes, which is 6 minutes quicker than the CUPRA Tavascan at 28 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 715 km, which is roughly 147 km more than the CUPRA Tavascan at approximately 568 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The CUPRA Tavascan consumes 151 Wh/km, compared to 188 Wh/km for the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric. That means the CUPRA Tavascan uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has approximately 94 kWh of useable battery , while the CUPRA Tavascan has approximately 77 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has the higher published DC figure (up to 330 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 22 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric supports up to 11 kW (22 kW optional), compared to up to 11 kW for the CUPRA Tavascan. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the CUPRA Tavascan is the more efficient choice at 151 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Mercedes-Benz GLC Electric has a WLTP rated range of approximately 715 km, which is roughly 147 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.