Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Cadillac LYRIQ vs Peugeot e-2008

Compared variants: 600 E4 AWD vs 54 kWh

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Cadillac LYRIQ has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, but the published charge-time data matters more for road-trip stops. The Peugeot e-2008 is listed at about 28 minutes versus 30 minutes for the Cadillac LYRIQ. The Peugeot e-2008 is more efficient at approximately 169 Wh/km. The Cadillac LYRIQ offers more WLTP rated range at 530 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Cadillac LYRIQ Peugeot e-2008
Compared variant 600 E4 AWD 54 kWh
Battery (approx.) ~102 kWh ~50.8 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~530 km ~406 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~222 Wh/km ~169 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 200 kW up to 107 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~30 min ~28 min
Max AC charging up to 11.5 kW up to 7.4 kW (11 kW optional)
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Cadillac LYRIQ has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, which is roughly 87% higher than the Peugeot e-2008 at 107 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Peugeot e-2008 is listed at about 28 minutes, which is 2 minutes quicker than the Cadillac LYRIQ at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Cadillac LYRIQ has a WLTP rated range of approximately 530 km, which is roughly 124 km more than the Peugeot e-2008 at approximately 406 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Peugeot e-2008 consumes 169 Wh/km, compared to 222 Wh/km for the Cadillac LYRIQ. That means the Peugeot e-2008 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Cadillac LYRIQ has approximately 102 kWh of useable battery , while the Peugeot e-2008 has approximately 50.8 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

The Cadillac LYRIQ has the higher published DC figure at up to 200 kW, but the Peugeot e-2008 has the shorter published charge time at approximately 28 minutes versus approximately 30 minutes. On road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Cadillac LYRIQ supports up to 11.5 kW, compared to up to 7.4 kW (11 kW optional) for the Peugeot e-2008. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Peugeot e-2008 is the more efficient choice at 169 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Cadillac LYRIQ has a WLTP rated range of approximately 530 km, which is roughly 124 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.