Charging Comparison
BYD SEAL U vs Mercedes-Benz EQC
Compared variants: 87 kWh Design vs 400 4MATIC
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The BYD SEAL U has the higher published DC charging figure at 140 kW, while the BYD SEAL U is more efficient at approximately 205 Wh/km. The BYD SEAL U offers more WLTP rated range at 500 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | BYD SEAL U | Mercedes-Benz EQC |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 87 kWh Design | 400 4MATIC |
| Battery (approx.) | ~87 kWh | ~80 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~500 km | ~411 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~205 Wh/km | ~223 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 140 kW | up to 112 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~34 min | ~36 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The BYD SEAL U has the higher published DC charging figure at 140 kW, which is roughly 25% higher than the Mercedes-Benz EQC at 112 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the BYD SEAL U is listed at about 34 minutes, which is 2 minutes quicker than the Mercedes-Benz EQC at 36 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The BYD SEAL U has a WLTP rated range of approximately 500 km, which is roughly 89 km more than the Mercedes-Benz EQC at approximately 411 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The BYD SEAL U consumes 205 Wh/km, compared to 223 Wh/km for the Mercedes-Benz EQC. That means the BYD SEAL U uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The BYD SEAL U has approximately 87 kWh of useable battery , while the Mercedes-Benz EQC has approximately 80 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the BYD SEAL U has the higher published DC figure (up to 140 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 34 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the BYD SEAL U is the more efficient choice at 205 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the BYD SEAL U has a WLTP rated range of approximately 500 km, which is roughly 89 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.