Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

BYD ATTO 3 vs Škoda Enyaq Coupe

Compared variants: 60.5 kWh vs 85

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 175 kW, while the Škoda Enyaq Coupe is more efficient at approximately 164 Wh/km. The Škoda Enyaq Coupe offers more WLTP rated range at 560 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec BYD ATTO 3 Škoda Enyaq Coupe
Compared variant 60.5 kWh 85
Battery (approx.) ~60.5 kWh ~77 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~420 km ~560 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~183 Wh/km ~164 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 89 kW up to 175 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~38 min ~26 min
Max AC charging up to 11 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe has the higher published DC fast-charging figure at 175 kW, which is roughly 97% higher than the BYD ATTO 3 at 89 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Škoda Enyaq Coupe finishes in about 26 minutes, which is 12 minutes quicker than the BYD ATTO 3 at 38 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Škoda Enyaq Coupe has a WLTP rated range of approximately 560 km, which is roughly 140 km more than the BYD ATTO 3 at approximately 420 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Škoda Enyaq Coupe consumes 164 Wh/km, compared to 183 Wh/km for the BYD ATTO 3. That means the Škoda Enyaq Coupe uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Škoda Enyaq Coupe has approximately 77 kWh of useable battery , while the BYD ATTO 3 has approximately 60.5 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

If fast charging is your priority, the Škoda Enyaq Coupe has the higher published DC figure (up to 175 kW) while matching the quickest published 10-80% time at approximately 26 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.

Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Škoda Enyaq Coupe is the more efficient choice at 164 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Škoda Enyaq Coupe has a WLTP rated range of approximately 560 km, which is roughly 140 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.