Charging Comparison
BMW i7 vs MG Cyberster
Compared variants: eDrive50 vs Trophy
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The BMW i7 has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, but both cars are listed at about 30 minutes for the published fast-charge window. The MG Cyberster is more efficient at approximately 175 Wh/km. The BMW i7 offers more WLTP rated range at 611 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | BMW i7 | MG Cyberster |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | eDrive50 | Trophy |
| Battery (approx.) | ~101.7 kWh | ~74.4 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~611 km | ~507 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~196 Wh/km | ~175 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 200 kW | up to 144 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The BMW i7 has the higher published DC charging figure at 200 kW, which is roughly 39% higher than the MG Cyberster at 144 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the MG Cyberster is listed at about 30 minutes, roughly matching the BMW i7. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.
Range and Efficiency
The BMW i7 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 611 km, which is roughly 104 km more than the MG Cyberster at approximately 507 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The MG Cyberster consumes 175 Wh/km, compared to 196 Wh/km for the BMW i7. That means the MG Cyberster uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The BMW i7 has approximately 101.7 kWh of useable battery , while the MG Cyberster has approximately 74.4 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the BMW i7 has the higher published DC figure (up to 200 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 30 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the MG Cyberster is the more efficient choice at 175 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the BMW i7 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 611 km, which is roughly 104 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.