Charging Comparison
BMW i4 eDrive35 vs Mazda 6e
Compared variants: eDrive35 vs Long Range 80 kWh
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The BMW i4 eDrive35 has the higher published DC charging figure at 180 kW, while the BMW i4 eDrive35 is more efficient at approximately 147 Wh/km. The Mazda 6e offers more WLTP rated range at 552 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | BMW i4 eDrive35 | Mazda 6e |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | eDrive35 | Long Range 80 kWh |
| Battery (approx.) | ~67.1 kWh | ~77.97 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~514 km | ~552 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~147 Wh/km | ~162 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 180 kW | up to 95 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~31 min | ~50 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The BMW i4 eDrive35 has the higher published DC charging figure at 180 kW, which is roughly 89% higher than the Mazda 6e at 95 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the BMW i4 eDrive35 is listed at about 31 minutes, which is 19 minutes quicker than the Mazda 6e at 50 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Mazda 6e has a WLTP rated range of approximately 552 km, which is roughly 38 km more than the BMW i4 eDrive35 at approximately 514 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The BMW i4 eDrive35 consumes 147 Wh/km, compared to 162 Wh/km for the Mazda 6e. That means the BMW i4 eDrive35 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mazda 6e has approximately 77.97 kWh of useable battery , while the BMW i4 eDrive35 has approximately 67.1 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the BMW i4 eDrive35 has the higher published DC figure (up to 180 kW) and the shorter published charge time at approximately 31 minutes. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the BMW i4 eDrive35 is the more efficient choice at 147 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Mazda 6e has a WLTP rated range of approximately 552 km, which is roughly 38 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.