Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
Both cars peak at 200 kW DC charging. The Volvo EC40 is more efficient at 188 Wh/km. The Alpine A390 offers more WLTP rated range at 550 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Alpine A390 | Volvo EC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~89 kWh | ~79 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~550 km | ~500 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~189 Wh/km | ~188 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 200 kW | up to 200 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~27 min | ~28 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 22 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Volvo EC40 has a peak DC charging speed of 200 kW, which is comparable to the Alpine A390 at 200 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Alpine A390 finishes in about 27 minutes, which is 1 minutes quicker than the Volvo EC40 at 28 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Alpine A390 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 550 km, which is roughly 50 km more than the Volvo EC40 at approximately 500 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Volvo EC40 consumes 188 Wh/km, compared to 189 Wh/km for the Alpine A390. That means the Volvo EC40 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Alpine A390 has approximately 89 kWh of useable battery , while the Volvo EC40 has approximately 79 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
Both cars offer similar DC fast charging at 200 kW peak. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Alpine A390 supports up to 22 kW, compared to 11 kW for the Volvo EC40. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Volvo EC40 is the more efficient choice at 188 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Alpine A390 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 550 km, which is roughly 50 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.