Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Alpine A390 charges faster with a peak of 200 kW DC, while the Alpine A390 is more efficient at 189 Wh/km. The Alpine A390 offers more WLTP rated range at 550 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Alpine A390 | Nissan Ariya |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~89 kWh | ~87 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~550 km | ~536 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~189 Wh/km | ~193 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 200 kW | up to 130 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~27 min | ~48 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 22 kW | up to 7.4 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Alpine A390 has a peak DC charging speed of 200 kW, which is roughly 54% faster than the Nissan Ariya at 130 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Alpine A390 finishes in about 27 minutes, which is 21 minutes quicker than the Nissan Ariya at 48 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Alpine A390 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 550 km, which is roughly 14 km more than the Nissan Ariya at approximately 536 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Alpine A390 consumes 189 Wh/km, compared to 193 Wh/km for the Nissan Ariya. That means the Alpine A390 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Alpine A390 has approximately 89 kWh of useable battery , while the Nissan Ariya has approximately 87 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Alpine A390 wins on both peak power (up to 200 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 27 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Alpine A390 supports up to 22 kW, compared to 7.4 kW for the Nissan Ariya. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can mean charging roughly twice as fast at those locations.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Alpine A390 is the more efficient choice at 189 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Alpine A390 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 550 km, which is roughly 14 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.