Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Alpine A290 has a higher peak charging speed at 100 kW DC, but the Mini Aceman actually finishes the 10-80% charge faster (30 min vs 30 min) thanks to its smaller battery. The Mini Aceman is more efficient at 170 Wh/km. The Alpine A290 offers more WLTP rated range at 380 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Alpine A290 | Mini Aceman |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~52 kWh | ~49.2 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~380 km | ~350 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~170 Wh/km | ~170 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 100 kW | up to 95 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Alpine A290 has a peak DC charging speed of 100 kW, which is roughly 5% faster than the Mini Aceman at 95 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Mini Aceman finishes in about 30 minutes, roughly matching the Alpine A290. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Alpine A290 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 380 km, which is roughly 30 km more than the Mini Aceman at approximately 350 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Mini Aceman consumes 170 Wh/km, compared to 170 Wh/km for the Alpine A290. That means the Mini Aceman uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Alpine A290 has approximately 52 kWh of useable battery , while the Mini Aceman has approximately 49.2 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
The Alpine A290 has the higher peak DC speed at up to 100 kW, but the Mini Aceman actually finishes the 10-80% charge faster at approximately 30 minutes versus approximately 30 minutes. That is because the Mini Aceman has a smaller battery to fill. On road trips, time at the plug matters more than peak power.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
Both cars have similar efficiency at 170 Wh/km, so daily charging costs should be comparable.
For maximum range between charges, the Alpine A290 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 380 km, which is roughly 30 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.