Charging Comparison
Alpine A290 vs Mini Aceman
Compared variants: 220 hp vs SE
Updated April 2026
Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Alpine A290 has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, but both cars are listed at about 30 minutes for the published fast-charge window. The Mini Aceman is more efficient at approximately 170 Wh/km. The Alpine A290 offers more WLTP rated range at 380 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Alpine A290 | Mini Aceman |
|---|---|---|
| Compared variant | 220 hp | SE |
| Battery (approx.) | ~52 kWh | ~49.2 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~380 km | ~350 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~170 Wh/km | ~170 Wh/km |
| DC fast charging (published) | up to 100 kW | up to 95 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~30 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Alpine A290 has the higher published DC charging figure at 100 kW, which is roughly 5% higher than the Mini Aceman at 95 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the published fast-charge window, the Mini Aceman is listed at about 30 minutes, roughly matching the Alpine A290. In this case, the headline kW number should not drive the decision by itself.
Range and Efficiency
The Alpine A290 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 380 km, which is roughly 30 km more than the Mini Aceman at approximately 350 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Mini Aceman consumes 170 Wh/km, compared to 170 Wh/km for the Alpine A290. That means the Mini Aceman uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Alpine A290 has approximately 52 kWh of useable battery , while the Mini Aceman has approximately 49.2 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging is your priority, the Alpine A290 has the higher published DC figure (up to 100 kW), but both cars are listed at approximately 30 minutes for the published fast-charge window. For long road trips, published stop time matters more than the headline kW number alone.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
Both cars have similar efficiency at 170 Wh/km, so daily charging costs should be comparable.
For maximum range between charges, the Alpine A290 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 380 km, which is roughly 30 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.