Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check your vehicle's manual for official specifications. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.
Quick verdict
The Abarth 600e charges faster with a peak of 100 kW DC, while the Mini Aceman is more efficient at 170 Wh/km. The Mini Aceman offers more WLTP rated range at 350 km.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Spec | Abarth 600e | Mini Aceman |
|---|---|---|
| Battery (approx.) | ~51 kWh | ~49.2 kWh |
| WLTP range (rated) | ~349 km | ~350 km |
| Efficiency (approx.) | ~181 Wh/km | ~170 Wh/km |
| Max DC charging | up to 100 kW | up to 95 kW |
| 10-80% charge time (approx.) | ~27 min | ~30 min |
| Max AC charging | up to 11 kW | up to 11 kW |
| DC connector | CCS2 | CCS2 |
Charging Speed
The Abarth 600e has a peak DC charging speed of 100 kW, which is roughly 5% faster than the Mini Aceman at 95 kW. In practice, peak speed only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.
For the 10-80% charge (the most common DC fast charging scenario), the Abarth 600e finishes in about 27 minutes, which is 3 minutes quicker than the Mini Aceman at 30 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.
Range and Efficiency
The Mini Aceman has a WLTP rated range of approximately 350 km, which is roughly 1 km more than the Abarth 600e at approximately 349 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.
Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Mini Aceman consumes 170 Wh/km, compared to 181 Wh/km for the Abarth 600e. That means the Mini Aceman uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.
A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Mini Aceman has approximately 49.2 kWh of useable battery , while the Abarth 600e has approximately 51 kWh.
Which One Should You Choose?
If fast charging speed is your priority, the Abarth 600e wins on both peak power (up to 100 kW) and time at the plug (approximately 27 minutes from 10-80%). For long road trips with multiple charging stops, that faster turnaround makes a real difference.
Both cars support 11 kW AC charging, so home and workplace charging speeds will be similar.
If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Mini Aceman is the more efficient choice at 170 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.
For maximum range between charges, the Mini Aceman has a WLTP rated range of approximately 350 km, which is roughly 1 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.
At the charger? Scan the screen.
Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free app.
From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.
EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.
Don't understand the screen? Scan it.
Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.
Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.