Skip to main content

Charging Comparison

Lotus Emeya vs Polestar 5

Compared variants: 600 vs Dual Motor

Updated April 2026

Share

Data shown is approximate and based on publicly available specifications and real-world estimates. For models with multiple battery versions, this page compares the variants listed above. Actual performance varies with driving conditions, temperature, state of charge, and charger hardware. Always check the manufacturer specification page and your vehicle's manual for official figures. EVcourse is not affiliated with any vehicle manufacturer.

Quick verdict

Both cars have a similar published DC fast-charging figure at 350 kW. The Polestar 5 is more efficient at approximately 183 Wh/km. The Polestar 5 offers more WLTP rated range at 670 km.

Side-by-Side Specs

Spec Lotus Emeya Polestar 5
Compared variant 600 Dual Motor
Battery (approx.) ~98.9 kWh ~106 kWh
WLTP range (rated) ~610 km ~670 km
Efficiency (approx.) ~190 Wh/km ~183 Wh/km
DC fast charging (published) up to 350 kW up to 350 kW
10-80% charge time (approx.) ~18 min ~22 min
Max AC charging up to 22 kW up to 11 kW
DC connector CCS2 CCS2

Charging Speed

The Polestar 5 has the higher published DC charging figure at 350 kW, which is comparable to the Lotus Emeya at 350 kW. In practice, that figure only tells part of the story. The charging curve, battery temperature, and state of charge all affect how quickly your car actually charges.

For the published fast-charge window, the Lotus Emeya is listed at about 18 minutes, which is 4 minutes quicker than the Polestar 5 at 22 minutes. On a road trip, that difference adds up over multiple stops.

Range and Efficiency

The Polestar 5 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 670 km, which is roughly 60 km more than the Lotus Emeya at approximately 610 km. WLTP is a standardized lab test. Expect your actual range to be lower, varying with speed, weather, terrain, and driving style.

Efficiency matters more than battery size for daily driving costs. The Polestar 5 consumes 183 Wh/km, compared to 190 Wh/km for the Lotus Emeya. That means the Polestar 5 uses less energy per kilometer, which translates to lower charging costs and fewer charging stops on longer drives.

A more efficient car does not always mean more range. Battery size plays a role too. The Polestar 5 has approximately 106 kWh of useable battery , while the Lotus Emeya has approximately 98.9 kWh.

Which One Should You Choose?

Both cars show similar published DC fast-charging figures at 350 kW. For road trips, the one with more range between stops may be more practical.

For AC charging (home wallboxes, workplace chargers, and public street chargers), the Lotus Emeya supports up to 22 kW, compared to up to 11 kW for the Polestar 5. In Europe, many public chargers are 22 kW AC, so this difference can matter at those locations if the higher AC figure is fitted on the car you buy.

If you mostly charge at home or at work and care more about daily driving costs, the Polestar 5 is the more efficient choice at 183 Wh/km. Lower consumption means lower electricity bills over time.

For maximum range between charges, the Polestar 5 has a WLTP rated range of approximately 670 km, which is roughly 60 km more. Both are capable EVs. The best choice depends on how you charge and how far you drive.

At the charger? Scan the screen.

Point your phone at any charger screen and get instant help. Free to try.

Get the app

From Finn, engineer: Charging specs alone do not tell the full story. Real-world charging speed depends on battery temperature, state of charge, and the charger itself. These comparisons use manufacturer-published data. Approximate values only.

EVcourse uses expert knowledge to translate charger screens and decode error codes instantly. Scan any display for help, free to start on iOS.

Don't understand the screen? Scan it.

Point your phone at any charger or car screen for instant help. Any brand, any language. Free to try on iOS.

Free to try on iOS. Android coming soon. Join the Android waitlist.